UW Health statement on the Supreme Court decision striking down Roe vs. Wade

School of Medicine and Public Health response to U.S. Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health

UW–Madison response to uncertainty created by Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health

Public Health Madison & Dane County statement on Supreme Court Decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health

UW–Madison Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology response to U.S. Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health

Physician attitudes toward abortion is the focus of a new (2022) report published in WMJ by faculty, staff, and learners from SMPH and the UW School of Nursing.

American Academy of Family Physicians' statement on Supreme Court Decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health

Association of American Medical Colleges' statement on Supreme Court Decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

American Academy of Pediatrics' statement on Supreme Court Decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' statement on the decision in Dobbs V. Jackson

American College of Physicians' statement on Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health

American Medical Association's statement on Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health

American Psychiatric Association statement on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

Joint Statement from Maternal Health Specialists on
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

Joint Statement from the American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, and American Psychiatric Association on Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health

Statement from The New York Academy of Medicine on Roe v. Wade Supreme Court Ruling

The US Supreme Court abortion verdict is a tragedy. This is how research organizations can help. Nature. 2022;606(7916):839-840. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-01760-6

Editors. Lawmakers v. The Scientific Realities of Human Reproduction [published online ahead of print, 2022 Jun 24]. N Engl J Med. 2022;10.1056/NEJMe2208288. doi:10.1056/NEJMe2208288

The Lancet. Why Roe v. Wade must be defended. Lancet. 2022;399(10338):1845. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00870-4

The US Supreme Court is wrong to disregard evidence on the harm of banning abortion. Nature. 2022;605(7909):193-194. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-01249-2